BUILT FOR UK CONVEYANCERS

AML that survives the audit.

Turn client information, bank statements and supporting evidence into a clear matter story: what is supported, what remains unresolved, who must act and whether the file is ready to progress.

Deterministic calculations, agent-assisted analysis and human-approved decisions stay connected to one audit record.

A controlled division of responsibility

CodeCalculates and reconciles the numbers
Agent assistanceExtracts and explains the evidence
Human judgementReviews findings and decides
Audit recordRecords what happened, and why

Human-approved AI throughout: agents prepare analysis for review, and there are no autonomous AML decisions.

The information exists. The file story often does not.

Most firms already hold questionnaires, identity evidence, bank statements, screening results, emails, gift documents, company records and file notes. What is harder to hold is one connected answer to the question every inspection asks — and every exchange deadline forces.

“Is this matter safe to progress — and can we show why?”

From uploaded evidence to a decision-ready matter.

One purchase runs through this whole page. The Okafors are buying 18 Riverside View for £425,000; their bank statement contains a credit their declared funding story does not explain. Follow how ConveySure surfaces it, reconciles it and holds the file until a person resolves it.

Illustrative purchase matter CONV-2026-0148 · Fictional example — all names, figures and results are invented

Daniel & Sarah Okafor — 18 Riverside View, Norwich Purchase · £425,000 · CONV-2026-0148 · Fictional example
EDD review Blocked

Overview

62%AML readiness

Readiness is calculated by code from controls, evidence and funding.

Overall stateBlocked
Risk levelEnhanced due diligence
MLROReferral pending
Recommended next action

Ask the client to explain the £24,500 credit from ABC Holdings.

  • Source of funds
    £24,500 of the funding story is unresolved
    Blocker
  • Evidence review
    June bank statement awaiting a human decision
    In review
  • Screening & intelligence
    Configured searches complete; one manual review open
    Manual review
Exchange target11 Sep 2026 — eight weeks away
Matter ownerJ. Whitfield, fee earner
Purchase price£425,000
Funding supported so far£400,500 of £425,000

Source Review

One question-led workspace: each funding source, the client's answer, the evidence it required, and the human decision — evidence sits under the question that asked for it.

SourceDeclaredSupportedPosition
Mortgage£280,000£280,000Supported
Parental gift£45,000£45,000Supported
Accumulated savings£100,000£75,500Partly supported
ABC Holdings credit£0£24,500Unresolved
June current-account statement — D. Okafor
Processed · 87 transactions extracted · salary and internal transfers identified · one unexplained credit
Human decision required
Cross-document checks
The £24,500 credit from ABC Holdings appears in the statement but nowhere in the declared source-of-funds story
Unresolved

Extraction and matching are prepared by agents; every finding is closed by a named reviewer.

Reports

AML matter report
Drafts from current deterministic facts and human-approved conclusions
Held
Why it is held
One material finding — the £24,500 ABC Holdings credit — has not yet been reviewed and approved
1 finding open

When the finding is resolved and approved, the report can be generated; historic versions stay on the audit record.

Audit

Every action, in order, with the actor and the time — the forensic record that survives inspection.

Client uploaded June bank statement
D. Okafor · client portal · 14 Aug 2026, 09:12
Evidence
Statement analysed · finding raised
Document-review agent · £24,500 ABC Holdings credit flagged · 14 Aug 2026, 09:13
Analysis
Referred to MLRO
J. Whitfield, fee earner · unresolved credit on an EDD matter · 14 Aug 2026, 10:02
MLRO

Filter by category, actor or date; export the filtered trail. No AML decision is ever made by an agent.

Each document should explain more than its filename.

When the Okafors’ June statement is uploaded, it stops being a PDF in a folder and becomes structured, reviewable work.

June current-account statementD. Okafor · 1–30 June 2026 · Fictional data
In review
Account holderDaniel Okafor
Transactions processed87
Salary credits£3,250 — matched to payslips
Internal transfers£20,000 — matched between own accounts
Declared gift£45,000 — matched to gift letter
Unexplained credit£24,500 — ABC Holdings
StatusAwaiting human review
What was extracted

Facts and transactions: dates, counterparties, amounts and running balances, ready to be checked rather than re-typed.

What was explained
  • Monthly salary credits matched against payslips
  • £20,000 movement recognised as an internal transfer, not new money
  • £45,000 credit matched to the declared parental gift
What requires review
  • £24,500 credit from ABC Holdings — no counterpart in the declared funding story, flagged for a human decision

Explore evidence intelligence

Understand the money before asking the client another question.

Code reconciles the declared funding story against what the evidence actually supports — so the only questions that reach the client are the ones that matter.

SourceDeclaredSupportedPosition
Mortgage£280,000£280,000Supported
Parental gift£45,000£45,000Supported
Accumulated savings£100,000£75,500Partly supported
ABC Holdings credit£0£24,500Unresolved
Purchase price£425,000£425,000Reconciles
Explained by code — no client question

The £20,000 transfer from the savings account was matched as an internal transfer between the client’s own accounts. It is not double-counted and does not generate a question.

Genuinely unresolved — human review

The £24,500 ABC Holdings credit does not match the declared funding story and requires human-reviewed clarification before the matter can progress.

Explore source of funds

Calculations by code. Explanations assisted by agents. Conclusions approved by people.

Give the MLRO the file story, not another incomplete referral.

When CONV-2026-0148 is referred, the decision briefing already contains the funding position, the unresolved evidence and the deadline pressure — connected, not copied and pasted.

Decision briefing — CONV-2026-0148Awaiting MLRO decision
Referral reason
Unexplained £24,500 credit from ABC Holdings conflicts with the declared source-of-funds story on an EDD matter
Current risk
Enhanced due diligence — risk assessment recorded on file
Evidence position
Statement processed; gift and salary matched; one finding open for human review
Funding gap
£400,500 of £425,000 supported; £24,500 unresolved
Intelligence
PEP, sanctions and adverse media complete; counterparty enquiry held for manual review
Exchange date
11 September 2026 — eight weeks away
Previous decisions
EDD confirmed at onboarding by M. Osei, MLRO; no earlier referrals
Suggested questions
Drafted client question on the ABC Holdings credit, ready for the fee earner to review and send
Decision optionsIllustrative — recorded by the MLRO
Approve Approve with conditions Request more information Maintain EDD Escalate

ConveySure prepares the context. The MLRO records the decision and the reasoning — the platform never decides for them.

See the MLRO workflow

Build the inspection record while the matter progresses.

Every readiness calculation, evidence decision and MLRO referral on the Okafor matter is already part of its audit bundle. Nothing is rebuilt at the end from memory and email searches.

Reports use current deterministic facts and human-approved conclusions. Historic versions remain part of the audit record.

Explore reports and audit

Audit bundle — CONV-2026-0148Held — one material finding remains unresolved
  • AML file note
    Matter summary, risk assessment and controls
    Current
  • Evidence schedule
    Documents, extraction summaries and reviewer decisions
    Current
  • Source-of-funds reconciliation
    Declared v supported, line by line
    £24,500 unresolved
  • Screening results
    PEP, sanctions and adverse media outcomes
    Recorded
  • Human dispositions
    Named reviewers and dates for each finding
    Recorded
  • MLRO decision
    Referral, decision and reasoning
    Pending
  • Audit timeline
    Chronological record of actions on the matter
    Continuous
  • Report version
    Generated when the open finding is approved
    Held
Illustrative bundle for the fictional Okafor matter.

One matter record. Different professional views.

On the fileFee earner AccountableMLRO OverseeingManaging partner
Clear next actions on every matterPrioritised decisions, not raw referralsFirm-level oversight of AML workload
Evidence review instead of manual re-readingConnected referral contextConsistent controls across teams
Only the client questions that matterRecorded reasoning on every decisionInspection visibility without rebuilding files

Clients receive clear, secure tasks through the client portal — without seeing internal risk, MLRO or SAR-sensitive information.

Not another ID check. Not another document store.

Screening or ID tool Document store ConveySure
Returns an identity or screening resultStores evidenceConnects evidence to the matter
Separate from funding reviewRequires manual interpretationReconciles the funding story
Limited view of matter readinessNo decision workflowShows blockers and next actions
Separate report trailManual file noteHuman-approved audit record

ConveySure is designed to sit above and connect the firm’s AML evidence and intelligence workflow — it works alongside existing screening and ID providers, not instead of them.

Flat monthly pricing, sized to the firm.

Professional

£299/month

For growing conveyancing teams.

Firm

£499/month

For larger firms needing broader oversight and configuration.

See the complete AML file take shape.

Follow one realistic purchase matter from client invitation and evidence upload through source-of-funds review, MLRO decision and audit-ready reporting.